Radiology Spotters Collection

Rickets Radiology: X-Ray Findings, Cupping, Fraying, Splaying

Bookmark
Please login to bookmark Close

Rickets is failure of mineralisation of the growth plate and of newly formed osteoid in the growing skeleton, and on radiographs it shows as widening of the physis with loss of the dense zone of provisional calcification, followed by metaphyseal cupping, fraying and splaying. The changes are most obvious where growth is fastest, at the distal femur, proximal tibia, distal radius and ulna and the anterior rib ends, so a single AP wrist and a single AP knee will make the diagnosis in most children. The radiograph tells you that rickets is present and how severe it is; only biochemistry tells you which of the calcipenic or phosphopenic causes is responsible. After the physes fuse the same disease of defective mineralisation is called osteomalacia.

Frontal radiograph of both lower limbs in a child with rickets showing genu varum, metaphyseal cupping, splaying and fraying at the knees and ankles
Frontal radiograph of both lower limbs in a young child with rickets. Note the symmetrical genu varum, the widened lucent physes and the cupped, splayed and frayed metaphyses at the knees and ankles.

Key facts for practice and radiology board exams

  • Earliest change: blurring then loss of the zone of provisional calcification with widening of the lucent physis, before any cupping or fraying is visible.
  • Three metaphyseal words: cupping is concavity, fraying is an indistinct brush-like margin, splaying is transverse widening of the metaphysis.
  • Films to request: AP wrist plus AP knee. Bilateral films and a full skeletal survey add nothing unless the differential includes abuse, metastases or a dysplasia.
  • Alkaline phosphatase is the screening biochemistry: it is raised in essentially all active rickets. A low alkaline phosphatase with rickets-like metaphyses is hypophosphatasia, not rickets.
  • Severity and follow-up: the Thacher Rickets Severity Score runs 0 to 10, wrist up to 4 points and knee up to 6, in half point steps [1].
  • Nutritional rickets treatment: vitamin D by age band for a minimum of 12 weeks, with at least 500 mg/day of calcium, per the 2016 global consensus [2].
  • X-linked hypophosphataemia is now a different disease to manage: burosumab produced substantial radiographic healing in 87 percent of children at week 64 versus 17 percent on conventional phosphate and active vitamin D [3], and is recommended first line for children with overt rickets in the 2025 clinical practice recommendations [4].
  • Medicolegal point: vitamin D deficiency without radiographic rickets does not explain fractures in an infant being assessed for non-accidental injury [5].

Quiz

What is the most common cause of rickets?

  1. Nutritional vitamin D deficiency
  2. Metabolic bone disease
  3. Genetic disorder
  4. Calcium deficiency

Why the metaphysis fails first

Endochondral ossification depends on a calcium and phosphate product high enough to mineralise the cartilage matrix of the hypertrophic zone. When it is not, hypertrophic chondrocytes fail to undergo apoptosis and pile up, the physeal cartilage column lengthens instead of being replaced by bone, and the metaphyseal front is left as soft unmineralised tissue that deforms under load. Low phosphate is the final common pathway in every form of rickets, whether it arrives through vitamin D or calcium deficiency with secondary hyperparathyroidism, or through direct renal phosphate wasting driven by fibroblast growth factor 23 [6][7].

Two consequences matter at the workstation. First, the radiographic changes appear only where a physis is growing quickly, which is why the wrist dominates in infancy and the knee dominates in the toddler and older child. Second, everything you see is a mineralisation problem, so the bone is not just abnormally shaped but abnormally soft, which is why bowing, buckling and Looser zones accompany the metaphyseal signs.

Rickets X-ray findings, sign by sign

Radiographic signWhat you actually seePractical note
Physeal wideningIncrease in the lucent gap between epiphysis and metaphysisEarliest and most sensitive sign; compare with the opposite limb only if uncertain
Loss of the zone of provisional calcificationThe thin dense white line at the metaphyseal margin blurs then disappearsIts reappearance as a sclerotic band is the first sign of healing
Metaphyseal cuppingConcave, cup-shaped metaphyseal margin moulded around the physisBest seen at the distal ulna, distal femur and proximal tibia
FrayingIndistinct, irregular, brush-like metaphyseal margin, sometimes called a paintbrush metaphysisGraded together with cupping in the Rickets Severity Score
Splaying or flaringTransverse widening of the metaphysis so that it overhangs the diaphysisCorrelates with the palpable wrist and ankle widening felt clinically
Osteopenia with coarse trabeculaeGeneralised loss of density with a coarsened, indistinct trabecular patternUsually absent in X-linked hypophosphataemia, where density is normal or increased
Bowing deformityGenu varum, genu valgum, coxa vara, anterolateral tibial bowingWeight bearing accentuates it; varus predominates in the toddler
Rachitic rosaryBulbous expansion of the anterior rib ends at the costochondral junctionsVisible on a chest radiograph obtained for another reason, a common incidental clue
Cranial changesWidened sutures, delayed anterior fontanelle closure, frontal bossing, craniotabesFrequent in infantile nutritional rickets
Looser zones (pseudofractures)Transverse lucent bands perpendicular to the cortex, often in the medial femoral neck, pubic rami, scapula and ribsThe osteomalacia counterpart, seen in adolescents and adults after physeal fusion
Slipped epiphyses and insufficiency fracturesSlipped upper femoral epiphysis, buckling of soft long bonesA soft metaphysis under load, more common in chronic untreated disease
Healing periosteal reactionSmooth subperiosteal new bone plus a dense metaphyseal bandDo not mistake healing rickets for infection or trauma
Radiographic signs of active rickets and their practical significance.
Lower limb radiograph in an older child with rickets showing bowing and widened cupped metaphyses at the knees and ankles
A second case. Lower limb radiograph in an older child showing bowing with widened, cupped metaphyses around the knees and ankles, and generally coarsened trabeculae.

Which radiographs to request, by age

AgeHighest yield siteWhy
Under 1 year, non-ambulantAP wrist for the distal radius and ulna; anterior rib ends on any chest filmFastest growing physes at this age; the knee may look near normal early
1 to 3 yearsAP wrist and AP kneeTransition period, so image both to avoid a false negative
Ambulant child and adolescentAP knee for the distal femur and proximal tibia, plus standing long leg film if deformity is being measuredMetaphyseal change and mechanical axis deviation are greatest here
Any age, monitoring treatmentOne AP wrist and one AP kneeThese are the two views the Rickets Severity Score is scored on [1]
Choose the film by growth velocity, not by where the child hurts.

A full skeletal survey is not part of the diagnosis of rickets. Request one only when the differential genuinely includes non-accidental injury, metastatic neuroblastoma or a skeletal dysplasia. Cross sectional imaging has no routine role; MRI is reserved for a complication such as a slipped epiphysis or for a suspected tumour causing tumour-induced osteomalacia.

Grading severity: the Thacher Rickets Severity Score

The Rickets Severity Score converts the radiographic appearance into a number so that response to treatment can be compared. It grades the degree of metaphyseal fraying and cupping and the proportion of the growth plate involved on one wrist and one knee radiograph, taking the worse side, and scores the radius and ulna separately at the wrist and the femur and tibia separately at the knee [1].

  • Wrist contributes up to 4 points, knee up to 6 points, total 0 to 10 in half point increments, where 0 is a normal radiograph.
  • Interobserver correlation was 0.84 or better and intraobserver correlation 0.89 or better in the original series of 67 children with active rickets [1].
  • The score correlates only moderately with alkaline phosphatase (r around 0.5), so it complements rather than replaces biochemistry [1][8].
  • In X-linked hypophosphataemia, a baseline score of 1.5 or more identified children with worse growth, worse six minute walk distance and more pain, which makes the score prognostic and not merely descriptive [8].
  • Trials of healing usually report the score alongside the Radiographic Global Impression of Change, a validated seven point scale from minus 3 to plus 3 that reads paired radiographs side by side [9].

Causes of rickets and their biochemical fingerprints

Rickets is conventionally split into calcipenic forms, driven by deficiency of vitamin D or dietary calcium, and phosphopenic forms, driven by renal phosphate wasting. The radiographs look broadly similar; the laboratory pattern is what separates them.

CauseCalciumPhosphateALPPTH25-OH vitamin DDistinguishing clue
Nutritional vitamin D deficiencyLow or low-normalLowHighHighLowCommonest cause worldwide; dark skin, exclusive breastfeeding without supplementation, limited sun exposure
Dietary calcium deficiencyLow or low-normalLow or normalHighHighNormalLow calcium intake diets; 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D is typically high
Vitamin D dependent rickets type 1A (CYP27B1)LowLowHighHighNormalLow 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D despite normal 25-OH vitamin D; needs calcitriol, not cholecalciferol
Vitamin D dependent rickets type 2A (receptor defect)LowLowHighHighNormalMarkedly high 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D; alopecia in many patients
X-linked hypophosphataemia (PHEX, FGF23 excess)NormalLowHighNormal or mildly highNormalIsolated renal phosphate wasting with low tubular reabsorption of phosphate; family history; dental abscesses
Chronic kidney disease (renal osteodystrophy)LowHighHighVery highNormal or lowHigh rather than low phosphate; look for other features of renal bone disease
Renal Fanconi syndromeNormalLowHighNormal or highNormalGlycosuria, aminoaciduria and proximal renal tubular acidosis accompany the phosphaturia
Tumour-induced osteomalaciaNormalLowHighNormalNormalAdolescent or adult with a small FGF23-secreting mesenchymal tumour; hunt with functional imaging
Metabolic bone disease of prematurityNormal or lowLowHighVariableNormal or lowVery low birth weight infant at 6 to 16 weeks; osteopenia and rib fractures dominate
Hypophosphatasia (mimic, not rickets)Normal or highNormal or highLowNormal or lowNormalLow alkaline phosphatase with lucent metaphyseal tongues; the single most important trap
Laboratory patterns that separate the causes of a rachitic radiograph.

Nutritional rickets versus X-linked hypophosphataemia on the radiograph

This is the distinction that changes management, because X-linked hypophosphataemia does not respond to plain vitamin D and now has a targeted treatment. Radiographs give useful pointers even before the biochemistry returns [10].

FeatureNutritional ricketsX-linked hypophosphataemia
Bone densityGeneralised osteopeniaNormal or increased, with coarse trabeculae
Metaphyseal changeFlorid cupping, fraying and splaying, often at every physis imagedPresent but frequently milder than the degree of deformity suggests
DeformityFollows the severity of the metaphyseal diseaseProminent lower limb bowing and coxa vara out of proportion to metaphyseal change
Extra-skeletal cluesRachitic rosary, craniotabes, widened sutures, muscle weakness, hypocalcaemic seizures in infancyDental abscesses with normal enamel, enthesopathy in older patients, craniosynostosis, disproportionate short stature
Response to cholecalciferolHealsDoes not heal; needs phosphate with active vitamin D, or burosumab
Radiographic and clinical discriminators between the two commonest patterns.

Differential diagnosis of the irregular metaphysis

EntityHow it differs from rickets
Newborn stress demineralisationMetaphyseal lucent bands with an intact zone of provisional calcification, in the first two months of life, resolving spontaneously
Classic metaphyseal lesion of infant abuseFocal corner or bucket-handle fragment with an otherwise sharp, normally mineralised metaphysis and normal alkaline phosphatase
Congenital syphilisSerrated lucent metaphyses, dense metaphyseal bands, diffuse periostitis and focal destruction of the medial proximal tibial metaphysis, the Wimberger corner sign
Metastatic neuroblastomaMetaphyseal lucent bands with permeative destruction, periosteal reaction and sutural splitting; the zone of provisional calcification stays intact
ScurvyDense zone of provisional calcification rather than a lost one, with the Trummerfeld lucent zone beneath it, the Wimberger ring around epiphyses and subperiosteal haemorrhage
HypophosphatasiaLucent metaphyseal tongues projecting into the metaphysis with a low serum alkaline phosphatase
Metaphyseal chondrodysplasia, Schmid typeRickets-like metaphyseal irregularity with entirely normal calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase and vitamin D
Physiological bowing and Blount diseaseNormal physes and metaphyseal mineralisation; Blount shows focal medial proximal tibial beaking and depression
MucopolysaccharidosisOther features of dysostosis multiplex, including oar-shaped ribs, bullet-shaped metacarpals and inferior vertebral beaking
Mimics of rickets, and the finding that resolves each one.

Rickets, fractures and suspected child abuse

This question reaches radiologists as an expert opinion request more often than as a diagnostic problem. The evidence is consistent: vitamin D deficiency is common in children, but radiographic rickets is not, and biochemical deficiency alone without radiographic disease has not been shown to cause the fracture patterns seen in abused infants [5]. The 2016 global consensus states that children with radiographically confirmed rickets have an increased fracture risk, while children with simple vitamin D deficiency do not [2]. Report what the radiograph shows, state explicitly whether the metaphyses are rachitic or normally mineralised, and avoid attributing a classic metaphyseal lesion to a low 25-hydroxyvitamin D result in the absence of rachitic change.

Treatment and what healing looks like

The 2016 global consensus on nutritional rickets defines vitamin D sufficiency as a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D above 50 nmol/L, insufficiency as 30 to 50 nmol/L and deficiency as below 30 nmol/L, and dietary calcium sufficiency in children over 12 months as more than 500 mg/day, insufficiency as 300 to 500 mg/day and deficiency as less than 300 mg/day [2].

AgeDaily vitamin D for at least 12 weeksSingle high dose alternativeMaintenance after treatment
Under 3 months2000 IU/dayNot recommended400 IU/day
3 to 12 months2000 IU/day50,000 IU400 IU/day
12 months to 12 years3000 to 6000 IU/day150,000 IU600 IU/day
Over 12 years6000 IU/day300,000 IU600 IU/day
Treatment of nutritional rickets, 2016 global consensus [2]. At least 500 mg/day of calcium, from diet or supplement, is given alongside vitamin D in every age band.

Prevention doses differ from treatment doses: 400 IU/day for all infants in the first year, at least 600 IU/day beyond 12 months, and 600 IU/day in pregnancy [2].

Radiographic healing

  • A dense sclerotic line reappears at the metaphyseal margin as the zone of provisional calcification remineralises. This is the earliest radiographic evidence of response.
  • The frayed metaphysis fills in and sharpens, physeal width returns towards normal, and periosteal new bone may appear along the shafts.
  • Deformity remodels slowly over months to years and is not an early endpoint. Persistent bowing after biochemical cure is a surgical, not a metabolic, question.
  • Repeat one wrist and one knee radiograph at around three months, matching the minimum 12 week treatment period, and read it against a falling alkaline phosphatase [2].
  • Failure to heal on adequate cholecalciferol should trigger a search for a phosphopenic cause, malabsorption, or poor adherence rather than a higher dose.

X-linked hypophosphataemia

Burosumab, a monoclonal antibody against fibroblast growth factor 23, changed the target in this group. In the randomised phase 3 trial of 61 children aged 1 to 12 years, subcutaneous burosumab 0.8 mg/kg every two weeks gave a Radiographic Global Impression of Change of plus 2.1 at week 64 versus plus 1.0 on conventional oral phosphate with active vitamin D, with substantial healing in 87 percent versus 17 percent, a Rickets Severity Score fall of 2.2 versus 1.0 points and a 33 percent fall in alkaline phosphatase versus 5 percent [3]. The 2025 international clinical practice recommendations now position burosumab as the treatment of choice for children with overt rickets, with radiographs and alkaline phosphatase used to monitor healing [4].

How to report a suspected rachitic radiograph

  1. State the physes assessed and name them, for example distal radius and ulna, distal femur and proximal tibia.
  2. Describe the physeal width and whether the zone of provisional calcification is preserved, blurred or lost.
  3. Describe cupping, fraying and splaying separately, and say which metaphyses are worst affected.
  4. Comment on bone density and trabecular pattern, since osteopenia points away from X-linked hypophosphataemia.
  5. Record deformity, including varus or valgus and any Looser zone, insufficiency fracture or slipped epiphysis.
  6. Give a Rickets Severity Score when the study is a baseline or a follow-up, so that later comparison is objective.
  7. Explicitly exclude the mimics that alter management: focal corner fractures, permeative metaphyseal destruction, and lucent metaphyseal tongues.
  8. Close with a recommendation for calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, parathyroid hormone and 25-hydroxyvitamin D if these are not already available.

Frequently asked questions

References

  1. Thacher TD, Fischer PR, Pettifor JM, Lawson JO, Manaster BJ, Reading JC. Radiographic scoring method for the assessment of the severity of nutritional rickets. J Trop Pediatr. 2000;46(3):132-139. PMID: 10893912.
  2. Munns CF, Shaw N, Kiely M, et al. Global consensus recommendations on prevention and management of nutritional rickets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(2):394-415. PMID: 26745253.
  3. Imel EA, Glorieux FH, Whyte MP, et al. Burosumab versus conventional therapy in children with X-linked hypophosphataemia: a randomised, active-controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10189):2416-2427. PMID: 31104833.
  4. Haffner D, Emma F, Seefried L, et al. Clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of X-linked hypophosphataemia. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2025;21(5):330-354. PMID: 39814982.
  5. Aldana Sierra MC, Christian CW. Vitamin D, rickets and child abuse: controversies and evidence. Pediatr Radiol. 2021;51(6):1014-1022. PMID: 33999242.
  6. Shore RM, Chesney RW. Rickets: part I. Pediatr Radiol. 2013;43(2):140-151. PMID: 23208530.
  7. Shore RM, Chesney RW. Rickets: part II. Pediatr Radiol. 2013;43(2):152-172. PMID: 23179485.
  8. Thacher TD, Pettifor JM, Tebben PJ, et al. Rickets severity predicts clinical outcomes in children with X-linked hypophosphatemia: utility of the radiographic Rickets Severity Score. Bone. 2019;122:76-81. PMID: 30772600.
  9. Lim R, Shailam R, Hulett R, et al. Validation of the Radiographic Global Impression of Change (RGI-C) score to assess healing of rickets in pediatric X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH). Bone. 2021;148:115964. PMID: 33878504.
  10. Martel-Villagran J, Arias-Medina A, Garcia-Mardones G. Usefulness of X-rays in the differential diagnosis of hypophosphataemic rickets. Adv Ther. 2020;37(Suppl 2):89-94. PMID: 32236877.
  11. Chang CY, Rosenthal DI, Mitchell DM, Handa A, Kattapuram SV, Huang AJ. Imaging findings of metabolic bone disease. Radiographics. 2016;36(6):1871-1887. PMID: 27726750.
  12. Elder CJ, Bishop NJ. Rickets. Lancet. 2014;383(9929):1665-1676. PMID: 24412049.

Case submitted by Dr Vichi Goel MD Radiodiagnosis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Wish to be a BETTER Radiologist? Join 15000 Radiology Colleagues !

Enter your email address below to access HIGH YIELD radiology content, updates, and resources.

Email Newsletter Subscription Pop Up

No spam, only VALUE! Unsubscribe anytime with a single click.

Scroll to Top