TIRADS Introduction:
- With the advent of high-resolution ultrasound, the number of thyroid nodules being detected is increasing. Most of these nodules are benign. Even the smaller malignant nodules have an indolent course [1]. Also, the mortality associated with papillary thyroid carcinomas has remained low[1]. Hence it is essential to evaluate which of these nodules actually need a fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC)/biopsy, which is the most effective method currently to diagnose whether a particular nodule is worrisome. Unnecessary biopsies can result in a burden on the healthcare system without significant benefits [1].
What is TIRADS / ti rads / TI-RADS and what does it stand for?
TI-RADS stands for Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.ย It is a reporting system for thyroid nodules on Ultrasound formulated. It consists of guidelines regarding whether a thyroid nodule should be followed up on ultrasound or to should be biopsied.
What is TIRADS?ย
- Different variations of the TI-RADS classifications and recommendations are available, the most commonly followed one is the TI-RADS. A recent study published in AJR confirms that the TI-RADS performs well as compared to other scoring systems [2].
- Committee for TI-RADS has the following objectives [3]:
- Develop management guidelines for nodules that are discovered incidentally on CT, MRI, PET or ultrasound.
- Produce a lexicon to describe all thyroid nodules on sonography.
- Develop a standardized TI-RADS risk-stratification system based on the lexicon to inform practitioners about which nodules warrant a biopsy.
TIRADS Guidelines:
- The guidelines have been described as per the TI-RADS 2017 radiology white paper. ย The full text of this article is available here: TI-RADS white paper 2017 pdf.
- These guidelines provide criteria and recommendations for follow-up and biopsy of thyroid nodules.
- Similar to the BI-RADS classification, thyroid nodules on ultrasound are classified ย according to the risk of malignancies into the following categories [1]:
TIRADS classification |
||||
Category | Points | Suspicion | Risk of Malignancy | Guideline |
TR1 | 0 | Benign | 0.3% | No FNA |
TR2 | 2 | Not suspicious | 1.5% | No FNA |
TR3 | 3 | Mildly suspicious | 4.8 | If >2.5 cm: FNA
If >1.5 cm:Follow up at 1,3 ,5 years |
TR4 | 4-6 | Moderately suspicious | 9.1 | If >1.5cm: FNA
If >1 cm:Follow up at 1,3 ,5 years |
TR5 | 7 or more | Highly suspicious | 35 | If >1 cm: FNA
If >0.5 cm follow annually for 5 years |
FNA- Fine Needle Aspiration.
Download a ready to print image of the TIRADS classification
-
- One need not memorize this table, instead, you can print a copy of this TI RADS chart and put it up near your reporting station. Click here for a ready to print image of the table. Alternatively, you can use this image provided by the online [1]ย
- Thyroid nodules are evaluated on certain sonographic criteria, each criterion is allotted points which are summed up and then each nodule is categorized in one of the above-mentioned categories, depending on the score.
- Following criteria have been described:
TIRADS categories Spongiform* Mixed solid and cystic Solid or almost completely solid 0 1 2 Hyperechoic or isoechoic Hypoechoic Very hypoechoic 1 2 3 Taller-than-wide 3 Ill-defined: 0 points Lobulated/irregular Extrathyroidal extension 0 2 3 Large comet tail artefact# Macrocalcifications Peripheral/rim calcifications Punctate echogenic foci$ 0 1 2 3
Criteria
Categories
Points
Composition
Cystic or almost completely cystic
0
Echogenicity
Anechoic
0
Shape
Wider-than-tall
0
Margin
Smooth: 0 points
0
Echogenic foci
None
0
*Spongiform nodule should be composed predominantly (>50%) of cystic spaces.
# โLarge comet-tail artifactsโ are defined as echogenic foci with V-shaped echoes >1 mm deep to them.
$ Punctate echogenic foci are non-shadowing. ย
Download a ready to print image of the TIRADS categories
Note:ย
- Doppler has not found to be useful in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions, however, the presence of vascularity rules out debris and hemorrhage which are inconsequential [1].
- The presence of โhaloโ is not specific and is not included in the lexicon.
- Additional benign appearances are not included in the lexicon, for eg
- White knight: Uniformly hyperechoic nodule.
- Giraffe hide: ย Mixed hyper and hypoechoic areas.
- There is no mention of the role of thyroid elastography in the guidelines.
TIRADS Reporting guidelines for thyroid nodules:
- Nodules should be measured in three orthogonal planes.
- If there are multiple nodules, not more than 4 nodules should be documented.
- Definition of growth:
- More than 20% increase in at least two dimensions AND a minimal increase of 2mm OR
- More than 50% increase in volume.
- It is important to compare not just with the immediate previous studies, but with the previous ones as well.
- Number of nodules to biopsy: If multiple nodules are present,ย biopsy two nodules with the highest score, which may not necessarily be the largest nodules. Suspicious nodes if present should also be biopsied.
- Cervical nodes: Following suspicious features have been described [1]:
-
- Globular shape
- Loss of normal echogenic hilum
- Presence of peripheral rather than hilar flow
- Heterogeneity with cystic components
- Punctate echogenic foci that may represent microcalcifications.
-
A simplified approach to thyroid ultrasound and TI-RADS:
The interpretation guidelines in the White paper may seem complex to radiologists and sonologists.
- TIRADS atlas:ย TI-RADS Atlas with images for reference for each category.
- TI RADS Sonographer’s Worksheet
Thyroid Ultrasound Reporting Template using TIRADS:
Patient Identification:ย
Patient Demographics:ย
Indication:
Technique: Ultrasound examination of the thyroid and adjacent soft tissues was performed.
FINDINGS
Thyroid size:
Texture:
Estimated total number of nodules โฅ1cm: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6-10, >10]
Number of spongiform nodules โฅ2cm not described below (TR1): [ ]
Number of mixed cystic and solid nodules โฅ1.5cm not described below (TR2): [ ]
Nodule #: [1, 2, 3, 4]
Maximum size: [ ] cm; Other 2 dimensions [ ] cm Location: [right, left, isthmus];[upper, mid, lower]
Composition: [cystic/almost completely cystic (0), spongiform (0), mixed cystic and solid (1), solid/almost completely solid (2), cannot determine (2)]
Echogenicity: [anechoic (0), hyperechoic (1), isoechoic (1), hypoechoic (2), very hypoechoic (3), cannot determine (1)]
Shape: [not taller-than-wide (0), taller-than-wide (3)]
Margins: [smooth (0), ill-defined (0), lobulated/irregular (2), extra-thyroidal extension (3), cannot determine (0)]
Echogenic foci: [none (0), large comet-tail artifacts (0), macrocalcifications (1), peripheral calcifications (2), punctate echogenic foci (3)]
Additional echogenic foci 1:
Significant change in size (>/= 20% in two dimensions and minimal increase of 2 mm): [No/Yes]
Change in features: [No/Yes]
Change in TI-RADS risk category: [No/Yes]
TI-RADS total points: [ ] TI-RADS risk category: [TR1 (0 points), TR2 (2 points), TR3 (3 points), TR4 (4-6 points), TR5 (โฅ7 points)]
TI-RADS recommendation: [Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration, Follow-up ultrasound in 1 year, No further follow-up]
IMPRESSION:
ย TI-RADS recommendations
TR5 (โฅ7 points) – FNA if โฅ 1cm, follow-up if 0.5 – 0.9 cm every year for 5 years
TR4 (4-6 points) – FNA if โฅ 1.5cm, follow-up if 1 – 1.4 cm in 1, 2, 3 and 5 years
TR3 (3 points)- FNA if โฅ 2.5cm, follow-up if 1.5 – 2.4 cm in 1, 3 and 5 years
TR2 (2 points) & TR1 (0 points) – No FNA or follow-up
Alternatively, you can download the template from here: TI-RADS Diagnostic Ultrasound Reporting Template
TIRADS examples with scoring: Test yourself!
Go through the categories once again, use the TIRADS calculator and test yourself!
Example 1 :
What is the TIRADS score for this nodule?
Example 2
What is the TIRADS score for this nodule?
Example 3:
What is the TIRADS score for this nodule?
Example 4:
What is the TIRADS score for this nodule?
If you got these wrong revise the guidelines here again.
Other useful TIRADS resources:
- TI-RADS Biopsy Reporting Template ย
- TI-RADS Atlas with images for reference for each category.
- TI-RADS Sonographer’s Worksheet
- TI-RADS guide for a description of features: TIRADS examples
- Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): A Userโs Guide: A radiology article for reference.
References:
- Rumack Diagnostic Ultrasound
- Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14:587โ595.
- Middleton WD, Teefey SA, Reading CC, Langer JE, Beland MD, Szabunio MM, et al. Comparison of Performance Characteristics of American College of Radiology TI-RADS, Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology TIRADS, and American Thyroid Association Guidelines. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(5):1148-54.
- TI-RADS. (2018). Acr.org. Retrieved 20 August 2018, from https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/TI-RADS
Visit the RadioGyan homepage for more radiology resources!
Thank you
Welcome, Joha!